Armed Forces: Pilots

The Lord Bishop of Hereford: To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to provide professional development and career opportunities, both inside and outside the Navy, for Navy fixed-wing pilots whose jobs no longer exist as a result of the Strategic Defence and Security Review; and how this compares with the RAF Harrier pilots in the equivalent situation.

Lord Astor of Hever: All Royal Navy (RN) and Royal Air Force (RAF) pilots previously employed on the Harrier have been re-employed in flying or flying-related appointments within their respective services. These appointments allow the pilots similar career opportunities and professional development as other RN and RAF pilots.
	RN pilots remain eligible for redundancy under the Armed Forces redundancy scheme. If selected, pilots will receive the normal resettlement support and training to help transition into civilian life. In respect of opportunities outside of the RN, a scheme providing targeted assistance for pilots to start a second career in the civilian aviation sector has been extended to include pilots who may leave the service under redundancy terms.
	Qualified RAF pilots will not be made redundant in the first phase of RAF redundancies.

Armed Forces: Staff

Lord Chidgey: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many officers, non-commissioned officers and servicemen and women have resigned or opted not to extend their engagements in 2009, 2010 and the first six months of 2011.

Lord Astor of Hever: The following table lists those service personnel who have voluntarily left the Armed Forces in 2009, 2010 and up to 30 April 2011.
	
		
			 Service  1 Jan-31 Dec 2009(1) 1 Jan-31 Dec 2010 1 Jan-30 Apr 2011 
			 Naval Service Officers 240 170 50 
			  Non-Commissioned Officers 630 470 210 
			  Other Ranks 680 540 250 
			 Army Officers 360 460 160 
			  Non-Commissioned Officers 1,520 1,980 700 
			  Other Ranks 1,050 1,800 550 
			 Royal Air Force Officers 180 170 60 
			  Non-Commissioned Officers 590 500 170 
			  Other Ranks 510 360 120 
		
	
	Information on those who decide not to extend their engagements is not held centrally and could only be provided at disproportionate cost.
	Note (1): Voluntary outflow figures for the Army are not held prior to 1 April 2009.

Asylum Seekers

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Browning on 16 June (WA 203-4), whether they intend to address the statistical gap in relation to the unavailability of data on the numbers of asylum applications since 1997 (a) that have been accepted, and (b) where the applicants were otherwise permitted to remain in the United Kingdom.

Baroness Browning: Historically, data prior to April 2000 (asylum applications) and May 2000 (asylum initial decisions) were derived from manual counts of cases as they arrived and when decisions were taken and only relate to principal applicants. It would not be possible to generate the necessary statistics for these earlier years.
	Generating statistics for between April 2000 (asylum applications)/May 2000 (asylum initial decisions) and 2004 for dependants and information on asylum applications from later years that have been accepted or been otherwise permitted to remain would involve matching databases which would be difficult, costly and time consuming and could not be done within existing resources.
	The United Kingdom does not yet have full controls in place for people leaving the country, so information is not available on the number of these asylum seekers and dependants currently residing in the United Kingdom.
	Data on numbers of principal asylum applicants between 2004 and 2009, as at May 2010 (tables provided in my answers to PQs HL8059 and HL9144), granted asylum, humanitarian protection and discretionary leave at initial decision and appeal are also available in the published tables of the Control of Immigration: Statistics United Kingdom 2009. This does not include applications accepted at other stages of the process or those permitted to remain outside of the asylum process. This publication is available in the Library of the House and the Home Office Science website at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/science-research/research-statistics.

Asylum Seekers

Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask Her Majesty's Government what guidance they have issued to the UK Border Agency regarding the appropriateness of returning people of Nuba ethnicity to Sudan, in the light of reports of violent attacks targeted at that group.

Baroness Browning: The UK Border Agency is aware of recent events in the South Kordofan area of Sudan and is monitoring the situation closely. Our returns guidance is constantly kept under review.
	All asylum claims are carefully considered on their individual circumstances in light of the latest country information. Those found to need international protection will be granted asylum or another form of leave. If claims are refused, applicants have a right of appeal to the immigration courts.
	The UK Border Agency does not enforce the return of individuals, unless it, and the UK courts, consider that it is safe to do so.

Bahrain

Lord Hylton: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the fairness of the trial in Bahrain, before a military security court, of doctors and nurses, which security court, of doctors and nurses, which resulted in two life-imprisonment sentences.

Lord Howell of Guildford: Our embassy has been able to attend some of the many trials currently taking place in the national safety courts, including the trials of the 48 medical staff. Our primary concerns in the legal process have been the methods of arrest, early access to legal counsel, allegations of abuse in detention, methods of interrogation, alleged coerced confessions, the charges brought against defendants, and the implications that medical professionals may not be allowed to carry out their duties without fear of recrimination.
	In the hearings we attended, the judging panel appeared to give due attention to the points raised by the defence and prosecution teams. One key difference between the national safety trials and the civil court hearings we observed is that the defendants have had little chance to speak, other than to confirm their names. We have also observed that many defendants do not have legal representation until after the first hearing, suggesting that they have not had access to legal counsel beforehand. The Government have told the embassy that some defendants may have refused counsel and that the court has therefore had to appoint a lawyer at the first hearing.
	We will continue to monitor the legal proceedings.

Bahrain

Lord Hylton: To ask Her Majesty's Government what information, if any, they have received about the beginning of dialogue in Bahrain between the Government and the opposition.

Lord Howell of Guildford: The national dialogue in Bahrain began on 2 July with an initial meeting and address by the chair of the national dialogue, the speaker of the National Assembly Mr Khalifa bin Ahmed Al Dhahrani. The participants agreed that the dialogue would cover four main themes: political, economic, human rights and social issues. A range of political societies, civil and non-governmental organisations, prominent figures within the kingdom of Bahrain and the media attended.

Benefits

Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the current total expenditure on all major welfare benefits, including housing benefit and council tax benefit, by benefit type for the latest year for which figures are available.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the percentage expenditure of Gross Domestic Product devoted to all major welfare benefits, including housing benefit and council tax benefit, for the latest year for which figures are available; and how this compares with other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the total annual expenditure on all major welfare benefits, including housing benefit and council tax benefit, for each financial year since 1997, by (a) cash amounts, (b) real terms costs in 2010 prices, and (c) as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product.

Lord Freud: Information relating to Great Britain has been placed in the Library.
	Benefit spending in Northern Ireland is a matter for the Northern Ireland Office. Child benefit (and tax credits) are administered by Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.
	Transfers of functions into and out of Department for Work and Pensions, and its predecessors, affect the observed trends, and figures here do not control for such transfers.
	Comparable OECD figures are not available, because of differences in individual countries' welfare systems. However, some information on OECD countries' welfare spending may be found at: http://www.oecd.org/els/social/indicators/SAG.
	DWP benefit expenditure information can be found at the following website: http://research.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd4/index.php?paqe=expenditure.
	DDP figures quoted are taken from the HM Treasury website as below. Please refer to this for more information regarding these figures http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/data_gdp_fig.htm.

Care Services

Baroness Wheeler: To ask Her Majesty's Government, in the light of the fact that 81 per cent of publicly funded home care is now provided by the independent sector, what assessment they have made of the Equality and Human Rights Commission's suggestion that independent providers of home care for older people may be operating outside the reach of the Human Rights Act 1998; and what plans they have to bring independent social care workers working in the home, or in care homes, within the social care regulatory framework.

Earl Howe: It is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way that is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. Under Section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, private companies which are exercising public functions will also be public authorities within the Act in respect of those functions. If a public authority of this kind has breached convention rights, a claim can be brought against it.
	The Government do not consider that it would be proportionate to subject all social care staff, many of whom are low-paid workers, to compulsory statutory professional regulation.
	The vetting and barring scheme (VBS) already provides arrangements to bar those who pose a risk to vulnerable people from working in the sector. Social care workers are within the scope of the VBS and will continue to be when the scheme is remodelled as proposed in the Protection of Freedoms Bill, which is currently before Parliament.
	However, ensuring that people are protected from abuse is also a key responsibility of employers, through effective training, good supervision of staff and robust disciplinary procedures to deal with misconduct. To support employers in their duties, the Government are committed to introducing, subject to parliamentary approval, a system of assured voluntary registration for unregulated workers, including social care workers in England, as a lever to improve quality and further safeguard people who use services.
	In addition, care providers of regulated activities are regulated by the Care Quality Commission, in accordance with statutory regulations. Providers must comply with these requirements to ensure the quality and safety of care. This includes ensuring care workers are appropriately trained and experienced and that service users are safeguarded from abuse and neglect.

Children: Poverty

Baroness Lister of Burtersett: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Lord Freud on 23 June (Official Report, col. 1385), what is the recent research about the impact of in-kind support on child poverty referred to.

Lord Freud: In my earlier Answer I restated our position that using income transfers alone is not the way to solve poverty and that a comprehensive approach is required. Thinking beyond income transfers to in-kind support is supported by the recent OECD report Doing Better for Families which highlighted that child poverty is lowest in those countries with strong service and childcare-based interventions.
	Our child poverty strategy demonstrates that we are making a sustained, long-term attempt to lift people out of not only poverty of income but poverty of aspiration and poverty of outcomes. We have maintained funding for Sure Start, with a refocused core offer that supports disadvantaged families, introduced new grants for the most disadvantaged young people through the fairness premium and the 16-19 bursary fund, and our welfare reforms are also based on the principle that work is key to reducing poverty.

Courts Service: User Survey

Lord Kennedy of Southwark: To ask Her Majesty's Government why they have ended the HM Courts Service Court User Survey.

Lord McNally: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, made a Written Ministerial Statement on 14 October 2010 (Official Report, col. 36WS) setting out why court users surveys would not be commissioned for 2010-11.
	In April 2011 Her Majesty's Courts Service (HMCS) and the Tribunals Service came together to form a new integrated agency, Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS). To have commissioned surveys for 2010-11 for the two agencies that were soon to close would not have represented good value for money, as the results would have been of limited use and would not have been available until after the creation of the new integrated agency.
	HMCTS is currently considering how best to extract relevant user insight and intelligence for the new agency at proportionate value and cost.

Courts Service: Victim and Witness Support

Lord Kennedy of Southwark: To ask Her Majesty's Government why they have ended the Witness and Victim Experience Survey.

Lord McNally: The Witness and Victim Experience Survey (WAVES) was a useful source of information on victims' and witnesses' experiences of the criminal justice system. However, following a review, it was concluded that although WAVES provided valuable information on a subset of victims and witnesses, the department's future evidence requirements would best be met through alternative approaches, and the survey was ended.
	The main reasons for this were that the principal findings from WAVES were stable over time, and the survey excluded some victim and witness groups of interest, such as domestic violence and sexual offences, victims and witnesses aged under 18, and cases that resulted in an out-of-court disposal or remained undetected. The data collected from WAVES are still relevant and continue to be analysed and used. Alternative methods for measuring victim and witness experiences are currently being explored by analysts within the department.

Crime: Drink and Drug Driving

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to paragraph 3.32 in the Government's response to the reports by Sir Peter North and the House of Commons Transport Select Committee on Drink and Drunk Driving, what progress has been made on the Home Office specification for an approved portable evidential breath testing device; and what they envisage as the timetable for its publication.

Baroness Browning: We are completing consultations and hope to publish the specification during the summer.

Criminal Records Bureau

Lord Tebbit: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Browning on 21 June (WA 275), whether they have made any assessment of the balance between cost savings achieved by outsourcing work of the Criminal Records Bureau to places outside the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom and the risks of failure to maintain confidentiality of the data being processed.

Baroness Browning: No such assessment has been made because the function which is undertaken outside the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom is the responsibility of Capita under the terms of the contract, which was originally fully evaluated through competition in accordance with EU procurement rules and regulations. The contract requires Capita to ensure the compliance of all its subcontractors, wherever they may be based, with all relevant provisions of the contract, including those relating to data protection.
	Additionally, site visits have been undertaken on behalf of the Criminal Records Bureau by an appropriate security consultant, to ensure the appropriateness of the information assurance governance arrangements and assurance was given following these visits.

Disabled People: Motability

Lord Morris of Manchester: To ask Her Majesty's Government what recent contact they have had with Motability about the Motability scheme; what the outcome was; and what action they have taken or will be taking as a result.

Lord Freud: Motability is an independent charity and is wholly responsible for the policies and overseeing the administration of the Motability scheme.
	The Department for Work and Pensions regularly meets with Motability to discuss the performance of the specialised vehicles fund, which Motability administers on its behalf, and to discuss the Motability scheme more generally. These discussions are helpful to both parties in order to ensure that the scheme, in which disabled people can use their disability living allowance to lease a vehicle, gives personal mobility on terms which represent value for money and meet the needs of disabled people. Senior governors and directors of Motability have also met with DWP Ministers for similar discussions about the specialised vehicles fund, the Motability scheme and a wide range of mobility and transport issues.

Drugs

Lord Moynihan: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether there is a correlation between the prohibition of controlled substances and the market for controlled drugs.

Baroness Browning: The Home Office has not made a formal assessment of the correlation between the prohibition of controlled substances and the market for controlled drugs.
	Previous research commissioned by the Home Office in 2007, The Illicit Drug Trade in the United Kingdom, provided some qualitative insight into the operation of illegal drug markets, including an indication that enforcement action taken against the trafficking of illegal drugs increased their price.
	Controlling drugs that cause harm is a key part of our efforts to protect the public, not least vulnerable people, and to meet our obligations under the international conventions on reducing drug misuse and drug trafficking.
	Reference: Matrix Knowledge Group (2007) The Illicit Drug Trade in the United Kingdom Home Office Online Report 20/07.
	http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20l10218135832/rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs07/rdsolr2007.pdf.

Economy: Northern Ireland

Lord Kilclooney: To ask Her Majesty's Government (a) on what date the HM Treasury consultation Relaunching the Northern Ireland Economy was originally due to close; (b) whether that date has now changed, and, if so, why, and on what date the consultation is now due to close; and (c) how this change, if any, was communicated to the Northern Ireland public.

Lord Sassoon: The HM Treasury consultation Rebalancing the Northern Ireland Economy was originally due to close on 24 June 201 1. The consultation closing date has now been extended to 8 July 2011. The consultation deadline has been extended to ensure all interested parties have sufficient time to submit a response. This includes attendees at a high-level consultation meeting, which will be held in Northern Ireland on 7 July. The extended deadline has been clearly stated on the HM Treasury Rebalancing the Northern Ireland Economy consultation web page.

Embryology

Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the figures recently released by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority relating to the number of women who have become pregnant through IVF but have subsequently decided to abort the pregnancy.

Earl Howe: The department has made no assessment of this information.

EU: Budget

Lord Lester of Herne Hill: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the United Kingdom financial contribution to (a) the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, and (b) the European Institute for Gender Equality.

Lord Howell of Guildford: The UK makes its contributions to the EU budget as a whole and not to individual areas of spending within it. The UK's contribution to the EU budget in 2011 was around 12 per cent, post-abatement.
	The Institute for Gender Equality received a total contribution from the EU budget of 7.5 million euros in 2011 and the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights received a total contribution from the EU budget of €20 million in 2011.
	In line with the UK's contribution to the overall EU budget, around 12 per cent of each of the institutions budgets could be considered the UK's contribution.

European Court of Human Rights

Lord Lester of Herne Hill: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their international legal obligation to comply with final judgments against the United Kingdom of the European Court of Human Rights.

Lord McNally: As a party to the European Convention on Human Rights, the UK is obliged to comply with judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) against the UK as a matter of international law. Article 46(1) of the convention, states: "The High Contracting Parties undertake to abide by the final judgment of the Court in any case to which they are parties".

Extremism

Lord Hylton: To ask Her Majesty's Government how they will modify the Prevent Violent Extremism strategy in the light of the report by the Police Science Institute at Cardiff University.

Baroness Browning: Following an extensive review the Home Office published the new Prevent Strategy on 7 June 2011. The report entitled Assessing the Effects of Prevent Policing by the Universities' Police Science Institute, Cardiff University, was submitted to the review and account was taken of it in preparing the strategy.

Finance: Regulation

Lord Lipsey: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will set out their planned timetable for the legislation envisaged in A new approach to financial regulation (Cm 8083).

Lord Sassoon: The Government published a White Paper and draft Bill, A New Approach to Financial Regulation: The Blueprint for Reform on 16 June.
	The draft Bill will shortly be considered in pre-legislative scrutiny (PLS) by an ad hoc Joint Committee of both Houses. PLS is currently scheduled to conclude by 1 December.
	The Government will consider the Joint Committee's report and introduce the Bill shortly thereafter. The Government expect the Bill to receive Royal Assent by the end of 2012, subject to parliamentary scheduling considerations.

Forestry Commission

The Earl of Clancarty: To ask Her Majesty's Government how much land as (a) a percentage, and (b) by acreage, the Forestry Commission has sold off in each year of the past 20 years.

Lord Henley: The public forest estate in England, Scotland and Wales, managed by the Forestry Commission, was treated as a single entity between 1991 and 1997. During that time the total area managed decreased by 59,923 hectares or 5.3 per cent of the 1991 land area.
	Forestry was devolved in 1999 and the area sold in Scotland and Wales from this time is a matter for the respective Administrations. Land sales in England from January 1997 to December 2010 are shown in the table below.
	
		
			 Sales-by calendar year 1997 to 2010 
			 Year Total area (hectares)) % of 1997 land area 
			 1997 2662 1.003 
			 1998 1269 0.478 
			 1999 283 0.107 
			 2000 441 0.166 
			 2001 97 0.037 
			 2002 888 0.334 
			 2003 806 0.304 
			 2004 866 0.326 
			 2005 47 0.018 
			 2006 198 0.075 
			 2007 1637 0.617 
			 2008 306 0.115 
			 2009 1056 0.398 
			 2010 1564 0.589 
		
	
	All new sales of public forest estate land were suspended on 17 February, pending receiving and considering the advice of the independent panel which is due to report in April 2012.

Government Departments: Research and Data

Lord Kennedy of Southwark: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Browning on 23 June (WA 334-6), when they expect to get the results of the research "Satisfying labour demands through migration".

Baroness Browning: The report for the project Satisfying Labour Demand through Migration is due to be published on the European Migration Network (EMN) website: (http://emn.intrasoft-intl.com/html/index.html) in the week commencing 4 July 2011.
	The findings from the UK report are included in a synthesis report on the topic, produced by the European Commission. The synthesis report was published on the EMN website on 15 June 2011 and can be accessed here: http://emn.intra_softintl.com/Downloads/prepare ShowFiles.do;jsessionid=3EOD982681B8144BED121 A00EA3EEAC6?entryTitle=01_Satisfyingpercent20 LABOURpercent20DEMANDpercent20through percent20migration.

Government Departments: TV Sets

Lord Jopling: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Taylor of Holbeach on 22 June (WA 338), whether they will answer now the questions put to them, which were why it took the Government 28 working days to respond to Lord Kennedy of Southwark's Question for Written Answer HL8962 when the target time for answering Questions for Written Answer is 10 working days, and why the Government have not yet counted the number of television sets in the Cabinet Office.

Lord Taylor of Holbeach: The Government always aim to answer Questions for Written Answer within 10 working days. Unfortunately there are occasionally delays in the process which means it is not always possible to achieve this.
	The Cabinet Office is a large estate comprising 11 buildings in central London and four in the regions. Information relating to the exact number of television sets is not held centrally and to collate this information would incur disproportionate cost.

Health and Social Care Bill

Lord Beecham: To ask Her Majesty's Government what legal advice they have sought regarding the reduction in capacity at strategic health authority and primary care trust levels in advance of the Health and Social Care Bill.

Earl Howe: The department has sought legal advice as required across the range of reforms contained in the Health and Social Care Bill, including around issues of reductions of capacity in the current National Health Service organisations.

Health: Preventative Care

Baroness Smith of Basildon: To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they intend to take in response to the finding in the recent Frontier Economics report that investment in the Women's Royal Voluntary Service services in preventative care for older people provides significant savings for the National Health Service and local authorities.

Earl Howe: Investment, by the National Health Service and local authorities, in integrated preventative services can lead to better outcomes for individuals including helping people to live independently for longer, and can realise efficiencies for both the NHS and local authorities. That is why we have invested £150 million in the NHS this year to support re-ablement, which will help people recover their independence after a spell in hospital.

Health: Reciprocal Agreements

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Earl Howe on 16 June (WA 209-10), which European Union member states, other than the Republic of Ireland, use an average cost basis for calculating health care payment claims between themselves and the United Kingdom; how the United Kingdom and Irish average costs of £3,600 and €6,800 are calculated; and what is the reason for the large differential.

Earl Howe: Under Regulation 1408/71, all member states claim healthcare costs for pensioners and their dependants and the dependants of workers on the basis of an average cost. Under Regulation 883/2004, which entered into force on 1 May 2010, this changed, and all member states will claim actual costs, except those member states that choose to continue to claim an average cost for healthcare provided to those residents.
	Those member states that will continue to claim an average cost are:
	Ireland; Spain;Italy;Malta;The Netherlands;Portugal; Finland; Sweden; andUnited Kingdom.
	The calculation of each member state's average costs is for the Government of that member state to decide. The UK's average costs are calculated on the basis of domestic healthcare expenditure and the size and profile of the UK population for the reference year in question.

Homeless People

Lord Roberts of Llandudno: To ask Her Majesty's Government which government department has responsibility for the needs of homeless people.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government how much was spent by central government in meeting the needs of homeless people in (a) 2000, (b) 2005, and (c) 2010.

Baroness Hanham: Department for Communities and Local Government is the lead department; however, given the sometimes complex nature of homelessness, other government departments need to be involved in helping meet the needs for homeless people-that is why my right honourable the Minister for Housing and Local Government established a cross-government working group on homelessness bringing together Ministers from eight government departments to address the complex causes of homelessness and rough sleeping-not only housing, but just as importantly health, work and training.
	The table below shows Department for Communities and Local Government homelessness grant funding for the years requested.
	
		
			  2000-01 (£m) 2005-06 (£m) 2010-11 (£m) 
			 Local Authority Revenue 2.9 44.7 74.1 
			 Local Authority Capital 0 39.5 0 
			 Voluntary Organisation Revenue 28.6 15.0 18.7 
			 Voluntary Organisation Capital 0 1.0 0 
			 Total 31.5 100.2 92.8 
		
	
	The table below shows Supporting People Programme homelessness funding, this is collected retrospective year end from top-tier local authorities via the Supporting People Local Systems data set. This includes spend broken down by Supporting People client groups including single homeless with support needs, homeless families with support needs and rough sleepers.
	
		
			  Homeless Families with Support Needs Rough Sleeper Single Homeless with support needs Total 
			 1 April 2009- 31 March 2010 50,607,342 19,661,062 220,649,883 290,918,287 
			 1 April 2005-31 March 2006 49,472,818 16,259,386 251,770,808 317,503,011 
		
	
	The Supporting People programme did not exist in 2000 so no comparable figures are available. Spend data to cover financial year 2010-11 are not available yet.
	This Government take homelessness very seriously that is why we are maintaining investment in homelessness grant at £100 million a year for each of the next four years to support local authorities and the voluntary sector in their work to tackle homelessness.
	A further £6.5 billion has been allocated to Supporting People over the spending review period.

Homelessness: Rough Sleepers

Lord Roberts of Llandudno: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the estimated number of rough sleepers in the United Kingdom in (a) 1990, (b) 1995, (c) 2000, (d) 2005, and (e) 2010.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many rough sleepers were found to have died in (a) 2005, and (b) 2010.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government what overnight sheltered accommodation is available for rough sleepers in (a) Glasgow, (b) Edinburgh, (c) Cardiff, (d) Belfast, (e) Liverpool, (f) Leeds, (g) Birmingham, and (h) the London Boroughs.

Baroness Hanham: The Government have introduced a new more accurate way of evaluating rough sleeping levels in England. Previously only local authorities where there was a known, or suspected, rough sleeping problem were required to provide a count. All areas across England now provide counts or robust estimates giving a clear national picture. Latest statistics show 1,768 rough sleepers in England on any one night in autumn 2010 and are published at the following link: http://www. communities.gov.uk/documents/statistics/xls/I 845849.xls.
	Rough sleeping statistics for previous years are published on the DCLG website but are not comparable to the latest figures and so have not been provided here.
	The department does not collect information specifically on the number of rough sleepers who were found to have died or overnight sheltered accommodation available for rough sleepers in cities. However, Homeless Link, the national umbrella organisation for front-line homelessness services, do offer a quick accommodation search facility at http://homelessuk.org/search/search AccomSimple.asp.
	This Government are committed to tackling rough sleeping and preventing homelessness. We have maintained the level of homelessness grant, with £400 million for local authorities and the voluntary sector over the next four years. A cross-departmental ministerial working group has been set up to address the complex causes of homelessness and improve support for homeless people.

House of Lords: Sitting Times

Lord Grocott: To ask the Chairman of Committees how many sitting days of the House since 1 January 2011 breached the firm convention that the House should rise no later than 10 pm on Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays, 7 pm on Thursdays and 3 pm on Fridays; and, in each case, by how much the time was exceeded.

Lord Brabazon of Tara: The Companion to the Standing Orders states that "it is a firm convention that the House normally rises by about 10 pm on Mondays to Wednesdays, by about 7 pm on Thursdays, and by about 3 pm on Fridays". Between 1 January and 28 June inclusive, the House sat past these times on 44 occasions, as shown in the table below.
	
		
			 Date Day Rising time Time past 10 pm, 7 pm or 3 pm (in hours:mins) 
			 10.01.2011 Monday 22:46 00:46 
			 11.01.2011 Tuesday 22:15 00:15 
			 12.01.2011 Wednesday 23:58 01:58 
			 17.01.2011 Monday 12:52 14:52 
			 19.01.2011 Wednesday 03:03 05:03 
			 24.01.2011 Monday 01:35 03:35 
			 25.01.2011 Tuesday 23:25 01:25 
			 26.01.2011 Wednesday 23:48 01:48 
			 31.01.2011 Monday 22:08 00:08 
			 08.02.2011 Tuesday 22:11 00:11 
			 09.02.2011 Wednesday 23:03 01:03 
			 16.02.2011 Wednesday 23:46 01:46 
			 28.02.2011 Monday 23:11 01:11 
			 01.03.2011 Tuesday 23:06 01:06 
			 02.03.2011 Wednesday 22:10 00:10 
			 03.03.2011 Thursday 19:06 00:06 
			 07.03.2011 Monday 01:13 03:13 
			 09.03.2011 Wednesday 00:30 02:30 
			 14.03.2011 Monday 22:42 00:42 
			 16.03.2011 Wednesday 22:19 00:19 
			 21.03.2011 Monday 23:39 01:39 
			 22.03.2011 Tuesday 00:08 02:08 
			 23.03.2011 Wednesday 22:46 00:46 
			 28.03.2011 Monday 23:52 01:52 
			 29.03.2011 Tuesday 01:02 03:02 
			 05.04.2011 Tuesday 22:44 00:44 
			 26.04.2011 Tuesday 22:08 00:08 
			 27.04.2011 Wednesday 23:32 01:32 
			 03.05.2011 Tuesday 23:07 01:07 
			 04.05.2011 Wednesday 22:18 00:18 
			 09.05.2011 Monday 22:19 00:19 
			 10.05.2011 Tuesday 22:09 00:09 
			 16.05.2011 Monday 22:06 00:06 
			 17.05.2011 Tuesday 22:41 00:41 
			 18.05.2011 Wednesday 22:09 00:09 
			 24.05.2011 Tuesday 00:14 00:14 
			 06.06.2011 Monday 22:47 00:47 
			 07.06.2011 Tuesday 22:42 00:42 
			 08.06.2011 Wednesday 22:13 00:13 
			 13.06.2011 Monday 22:23 00:23 
			 14.06.2011 Tuesday 22:32 00:32 
			 16.06.2011 Thursday 22:00 03:00 
			 23.06.2011 Thursday 19:27 00:27 
			 28.06.2011 Tuesday 22:18 00:18

Houses of Parliament: Refurbishment

Lord Grocott: To ask the Chairman of Committees which House refurbishment contracts have been rescheduled as a result of the additional sitting week in October; and, in each case, what additional costs have been incurred.

Lord Brabazon of Tara: It is likely that the additional sitting week in October will disrupt works planned as part of the mechanical and electrical works programme, the purpose of which is to refit the mechanical and electrical building services within the Palace of Westminster. The contract for this programme will not be rescheduled, but the additional sitting week means that some work, previously scheduled for that week, will now need to be carried out when the House is not sitting and at weekends. It is estimated that these changes could cost approximately £25-30,000, of which the House of Lords will pay 40 per cent. It is also likely that the additional sitting week will disrupt the programme of occupation for Millbank House, but the cost implications of this have not yet been quantified.

Housing

Baroness Ford: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many homes in receipt of funding by the Home and Communities Agency will be built to Code Level 4 of the Sustainable Buildings Code in the financial year 2011-2012.

Baroness Hanham: The table below sets out forecast unit completions for the 2011-12 financial year, achieving Code for Sustainable Homes level 4 or better, funded through the National Affordable Housing Programme.
	
		
			 Sustainable Homes Forecast Completions 2011-12 
			 Level Four (****) 7,957 
			 Level Five (*****) 111 
			 Level Six (******) 151 
		
	
	Source: Homes and Communities Agency, 24 June, 2011.

Housing

Baroness King of Bow: To ask Her Majesty's Government how much funding was made available to (a) each local authority and (b) each other agency under the Overcrowded Housing Pathfinder Initiative in each year it operated.

Baroness Hanham: The funding made available to each local authority in England under the overcrowding pathfinder initiative in each year is set out in the table below. No funding was made available by the department to other agencies under this initiative.
	
		
			 Local Authority Pathfinders 
			 Local Authority 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Total 
			  £000s £000s £000s  
			 London Borough of Barking AND Dagenham 150 218 100 468,000 
			 London Borough of Barnet 150 160 100 410,000 
			 London Borough of Bexley 100 80 50 230,000 
			 London Borough of Brent 100 100 100 300,000 
			 London Borough of Bromley 100 100 80 280,000 
			 London Borough of Camden 100 180 120 400,000 
			 London Borough of Croydon 200 180 100 480,000 
			 London Borough of Ealing 100 242 100 442,000 
			 London Borough of Enfield 100 90 100 290,000 
			 London Borough of Greenwich 100 100 120 320,000 
			 London Borough of Hackney 100 130 120 350,000 
			 London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham 158.5 300 120 578,500 
			 London Borough of Haringey 100 110 100 310,000 
			 London Borough of Harrow 100 100 80 280,000 
			 London Borough of Havering 100 120 80 300,000 
			 London Borough of Hillingdon 100 120 120 340,000 
			 London Borough of Hounslow 100 100 100 300,000 
			 London Borough of Islington 100 130 120 350,000 
			 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea 100 130 100 330,000 
			 Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames 100 160 100 360,000 
			 London Borough of Lambeth 100 60 80 240,000 
			 London Borough of Lewisham 100 120 80 300,000 
			 London Borough of Merton 100  50 150,000 
			 London Borough of Newham 100 80 100 280,000 
			 London Borough of Redbridge 100 80 50 230,000 
			 London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames 100 60 50 210,000 
			 London Borough of Southwark 210 222 120 552,000 
			 London Borough of Sutton 100 90 80 270,000 
			 London Borough of Tower Hamlets 100 110 120 330,000 
			 London Borough of Waltham Forest 100 100 100 300,000 
			 London Borough of Wandsworth 100 70 20 190,000 
			 London Borough of Westminster 100 90 100 290,000 
			 City of London 100   100,000 
			 Birmingham City Council 100 130 120 350,000 
			 Bradford Metropolitan District Council 100 100 100 300,000 
			 Leicester City Council 100 100 80 280,000 
			 Liverpool City Council 100 70 50 220,000 
			 Manchester City Council 100 130 120 350,000 
			 Bristol City Council 25 65 50 140,000 
			 Coventry City Council 25  - 25,000 
			 Dudley Metropolitan District Council 25 25 50 100,000 
			 Kirklees Metropolitan Council 25 35 80 140,000 
			 Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council 25 35 50 110,000 
			 Leeds City Council 25 105 100 230,000 
			 Luton Borough Council 25 35 50 110,000 
			 Medway Council 25  50 75,000 
			 Nottingham City Council 25 45 80 150,000 
			 Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council 25 65 80 170,000 
			 Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council 25 65 50 140,000 
			 Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council 25 45 100 170,000 
			 Southampton City Council 25 55 80 160,000 
			 Sheffield City Council 25 35 80 140,000 
			 Slough Borough Council 25 25 80 130,000 
			 Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council 25 45 80 150,000 
			 Wigan Council 25 25 50 100,000 
			 Total £4,593,500 £5,167,000 £4,540,000 £14,300,500 
		
	
	This programme was a time-limited, three-year pilot scheme that was scheduled to end in 2010-11.

Immigration

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Browning on 23 June (WA 342), how the absence of non-European Union students working in the United Kingdom can create a loss of output; whether that student output would not otherwise be produced; and why it was impossible to make estimates of the extra annual cost of providing housing for the current number of student residents.

Baroness Browning: The student proposals are estimated to reduce output because some students and their dependants will no longer contribute to economic output through work, either because they no longer come to the UK, or because their right to work while in the UK is removed.
	The extent to which output is lost depends in part on the extent to which non-migrant labour fills the gap. The evidence from existing economic literature implies that there will be no displacement of non-migrant workers by migrants. However, it is not clear that this necessarily applies at a time when growth in the economy is less well established. If there was some displacement, the economic impacts would be significantly lower. The Migration Advisory Committee has been commissioned to research the labour market, social and public service impacts of migration, including the issue of displacement, and is due to report in November.
	The impact of providing housing for students, for example on rents or capacity, was considered but we were unable to estimate the impact this might have due to the absence of suitable data, and the complex way these impacts are felt.

Immigration: Children in Detention

Lord Roberts of Llandudno: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many children were detained for immigration purposes in each month of 2011.

Baroness Browning: Monthly figures are not available. Information on the number of children in detention is collected on the last day of each quarter. The latest published information shows that as at the 31 March 2011 there were no children recorded as being in detention. The table below shows the number of children entering detention, held solely under Immigration Act powers, by month, January to May 2011.
	
		
			 Children entering detention (M)(1) held solely under Immigration Act powers, by place of initial detention, January to May 2011 (2)(3)(4) 
			 United Kingdom  Number of children 
			 Place of initial detention Jan Feb Mar Apr May Total 
			 UK Border Agency Removal Centres   
			 Brook House 0 0 1 0 0 1 
			 Campsfield House 0 2 0 0 1 3 
			 Dover Immigration Removal Centre 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Dungavel 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Harmondsworth 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Haslar 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Lindholme 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Morton Hall (5) : : : : 0 0 
			 Tinsley House 2 0 4 0 7 13 
			 Yarl's Wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 UK Border Agency Short Term Holding Facilities   
			 Colnbrook Short Term 0 0 1 0 0 1 
			 Pennine House 0 0 0 0 0 0 
			 Grand Total 2 2 6 0 8 18 
		
	
	(1) Some detainees may be recorded more than once if, for example, the person has been detained on more than one separate occasion in the time period shown, such as a person who has left detention, but has subsequently been redetained.
	(2) Figures exclude persons recorded as entering police cells and Prison Service establishments, those recorded as detained under both criminal and immigration powers and their dependants.
	(3) Figures include dependants.
	(4) May include persons detained for less than 24 hours.
	(5) Morton Hall opened on 16 May 2011.
	(M) These figures are based on management information and are not subject to the detailed checks that apply for national statistics. They are provisional and subject to change. These figures may alter when produced for the national statistics publication following more detailed checking.
	: Not applicable.
	Information on numbers of children entering detention is published monthly and is available from the Home Office Science, research and statistics website at: http://homeoffice.gov.uk/science-research/research-statistics/migration/migration-statistics1/.
	A copy of the latest month will be placed in the House Library. June 2011 figures will be available on 28 July 2011. Information on children detained as at the last day of each quarter, solely under Immigration Act powers, is published quarterly in the Control of Immigration: Quarterly Statistical Summary, which is available from the same website and from the Library of the House. Figures for those detained as at 30 June 2011 will be published on 25 August 2011.

Migration Advisory Committee

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Neville-Jones on 27 January (WA 202), whether they will (a) review the purpose of the Migration Advisory Committee and its remit to advise on labour market needs and economic impacts in migration policy development, and (b) consider extending its membership beyond labour market economists to others with relevant interests.

Baroness Browning: The Government have no plans to alter the purpose, remit or membership of the Migration Advisory Committee.

NHS: Peterborough Primary Care Trust

Lord Mawhinney: To ask Her Majesty's Government why the Peterborough Primary Care Trust has not signed a contract with the Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Trust for the provision of clinical services for 2011-12.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many chief executives, or acting chief executives, the Peterborough Primary Care Trust has had in the past three years.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many finance directors, or acting finance directors, the Peterborough Primary Care Trust has had in the past three years.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many meetings directly related to the Peterborough Primary Care Trust's accumulated debt has (a) the chairman, and (b) the chief executive of the strategic health authority had with the chairman of Peterborough Primary Care Trust.

Earl Howe: This is a matter for the National Health Service locally and as such, the information requested is not centrally collected.
	The noble Lord may wish to contact the chair of East of England strategic health authority directly for more information.

NHS: Primary Care Trusts

Lord Mawhinney: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the chairmen of primary care trusts have a contractual obligation to spend time at the trust in person; and, if so, who is responsible for monitoring that requirement.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government what guidance they have issued on the number of hours per week a chairman of a primary care trust is expected to devote to trust business; and who is responsible for monitoring time spent.

Earl Howe: Chairs of primary care trusts (PCTs) are public appointments, and as such, are not subject to a contract of service or contract for services. The terms and conditions attached to a PCT chair's appointment states a time commitment of three to three and a half days per week. There is an expectation that a proportion of the time PCT chairs spend on their role will be on trust premises; however, the amount of time this involves will vary from week to week. The performance appraisal of PCT chairs is the responsibility of strategic health authority chairs.

NHS: Reform

Baroness Thornton: To ask Her Majesty's Government what consideration has been given to the second recommendation of the report by the King's Fund Commission on Leadership and Management in the National Health Service that the Government's plan to reduce net management posts by 45 per cent should be revisited.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their timescale for the planned reduction by 45 per cent in net NHS management posts; and what percentage reduction is envisaged for each year.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government what impact assessment has been made of proposals to reduce management posts in the National Health Service by 45 per cent.

Earl Howe: Strong leaders, particularly clinical leaders, are essential to delivering a modern National Health Service that gives patients the best care and outcomes. We will consider the recommendations of the King's Fund; while we recognise that we will always need good managers in the NHS, we want those at the front line to have more of a say-less bureaucracy for managers, and a leadership role for clinicians. Our approach to reducing administration costs across the sector is based not upon simple cuts but on systematic modernisation, which will remove and streamline layers of bureaucracy while empowering professionals and patients.
	The Government have committed to reducing administration costs across the public sector by one-third by the end of the spending review. The department will achieve this by removing layers of bureaucracy, closing primary care trusts and strategic health authorities and moving responsibility for commissioning closer to patients.
	The coalition Government's commitment to reduce over 45 per cent of management costs (not posts) by the end of the spending review is included within the one-third reduction in overall administration costs.
	The costs and benefits of reducing administration costs were published in the impact assessment of the Health and Social Care Bill in January this year. A revised impact assessment will be published when the revised Bill enters the House of Lords. The timetable for the reduction is currently being considered in the light of the changes to the Bill, but the total reduction will be achieved by the end of the spending review.

NHS: Restructuring

Baroness Wheeler: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will publish a workforce transition strategy to guide the current changes to NHS structures.

Earl Howe: A national human resources transition framework which provides generic guidance, covering the employment and human resources processes throughout the transition will be published during the week commencing 4 July 2011. This framework is intended to help provide consistency during the transition as well as encouraging best human resources practice throughout.

NHS: Service Quality

Lord Beecham: To ask Her Majesty's Government what advice they have commissioned or received about the impact of changes in staff numbers and organisational change on the quality of services in the National Health Service.

Earl Howe: It is the responsibility of local National Health Service organisations to plan and deliver a workforce appropriate to the needs of their local population, based on clinical need and sound evidence.
	The department has been working with strategic health authorities (SHAs) workforce colleagues to develop an assurance process and a mechanism to give local NHS organisations, SHAs, the department, Ministers and the public reassurance that workforce plans are safe, affordable and do not compromise quality.
	Local safety and quality assurance processes for workforce plans should reflect clinically led service redesign and ensure there is sign-off by the provider medical directors and nursing directors.

Northern Ireland: Recognition Payments

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Sassoon on 22 June (WA 315), what was the tax status of payments to Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) officers under the measures taken to implement the Report of the Independent Commission for Policing in Northern Ireland; under what legislation recognition payments made to former part-time RUC reserve officers constitute earnings derived from employment; and whether redundancy payments made to civil servants are liable to tax.

Lord Sassoon: Payments to Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) officers were taxed in line with normal employment income tax rules. Income tax law provides that an employee is liable to tax in respect of the earnings from his/her employment, which are defined as all salaries, fees, wages, perks and profits whatsoever. The principal legislation is the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003.
	Payments made on the termination of employment are different. A genuine ex gratia redundancy payment is not a reward for an employee's services-it is compensation for the premature loss of his/her job. Nevertheless, the excess of payments above £30,000 are treated as employment income by the law. This applies to civil servants in the same way as any other group of employees.

Peru

Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask Her Majesty's Government what reports they have received about a sterilisation programme in Peru and about the number of women who have allegedly died as a consequence of the programme; and what representations they have made since May 2010 to the Government of Peru regarding the programme.

Lord Howell of Guildford: The Peruvian Government commission set up to investigate the programme concluded in 2002 that the responsible parties should be brought to justice and the victims be compensated. Investigations carried out by the commission and independent human rights groups suggest at least 20 women died as a direct result of the programme.
	Former President Alberto Fujimori's programme of mass sterilisation was carried out in Peru from 1996 to 1998. We have received no new reports and have made no new representations on the subject to the Government of Peru during the period in question.

Playing Fields

Lord Ouseley: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many playing fields have been lost over the past 36 months; and what assessment they have made of the implications for the leisure, recreational fitness and health of the population.

Baroness Garden of Frognal: The Department for Culture, Media and Sport does not hold records on the number of playing fields that have been lost over the past 36 months and has made no assessment of any such loss. However, Sport England records the number of applications for new playing fields received and approved by local planning authorities. The most recent data available can be found in the following table:
	
		
			  2006-07  2007-08  2008-09  
			  Total % Total % Total % 
			 Total number of applications 1267  1287  1322  
			 Number of approved applications by the Local Planning Authority 985 78 991 77 1048 79 
			 Rejected or withdrawn by LPA 201 16 216 17 191 14 
			 Applications yet to be decided by LPA 81 6 80 6 83 6 
		
	
	Sport England is a statutory consultee on planning applications that affect playing fields. This means that any planning application that affects a playing field has to be referred to Sport England for comment by the local authority. As part of Sport England's £135 million mass participation initiative Places, People, Play, the Minister for Sport and the Olympics and Sport England recently launched Protecting Playing Fields, the £10 million fund to protect and improve sports fields across the country. The programme will fund projects that create, develop and improve playing fields for sporting and community use and offer long-term protection of the site for sport.

Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre: Performance Targets

Lord Kennedy of Southwark: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by Baroness Hanham on 23 June (WS 133), what were the performance targets achieved by the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre for the period 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2011.

Baroness Hanham: Performance against targets for the financial year ending March 2011 were as follows:
	
		
			 Contribution to the Exchequer: Target: £1 .20 million 
			  Outturn: £1 .20 million 
			 Capacity utilisation: Target: 65.0% 
			  Outturn 54.3% 
			 Score for value for money: Target: 90.0% 
			  Outturn: 97.6% 
			 Complaints per 100 events: Target less than 2.0 
			  Outturn 0.32 
			 Response time for complaints: Target less than 4 days 
			  Outturn 1.0 day 
		
	
	The drop in occupancy percentage for the year was directly related to fewer meetings taking place, particularly those from government departments.

Republic of Ireland: Deportation

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Browning on 16 June (WA 216), why the public interest is not served by deportations of criminals to the Republic of Ireland unless serving a sentence of more than 10 years; whether they will review the 2007 decision not to deport Irish nationals save in exceptional circumstances; and why the numbers deported have reduced in the last four years.

Baroness Browning: In his Statement of 19 February 2007 which set out revised criteria for considering Irish nationals for deportation, the right honourable Member for Birmingham, Hodge Hill (the then Immigration Minister) stated that "in reviewing our approach in this area we have taken into account the close historical, community and political ties between the United Kingdom and Ireland, along with the existence of the common travel area". There are currently no plans to review this policy. Most of the 18 Irish nationals included in the figures provided for 2007 were deported before the announcement of 19 February. Only small numbers of Irish nationals have been deported from the UK since that date.

Retail: Mary Portas Review

Lord Myners: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether recent comments by Ms Mary Portas on the future of the United Kingdom high street are consistent with the requirement for objectivity in her role as a Government adviser.

Baroness Wilcox: This review covers a subject that is of great interest to all citizens. Whilst it has been commissioned-and is supported by-the Government, it remains independent. Mary Portas is listening to a wide range of stakeholders.

Sexual Assault Referral Centres

Baroness Gould of Potternewton: To ask Her Majesty's Government what are the funding arrangements for the sexual assault referral centres in England; and how the centres are monitored to ensure that they are providing the best possible service for those who have been raped or sexually assaulted.

Baroness Browning: Sexual assault referral centre (SARC) are locally commissioned on a collaborative basis by police forces and NHS primary care trusts and it is for local areas to determine what level of funding and service provision is required. The Home Secretary has committed to providing £1.72 million of funding per annum from the department's crime prevention budget over the next four years to part-fund independent sexual violence adviser (ISVA) posts. This includes 29 ISVAs working in SARCs. Local partners are responsible for ensuring that the service provided by their SARC meets the standards set in the joint Home Office and Department of Health guidance. In addition, the NHS provision in SARCs is subject to the regulatory regime of the Care Quality Standards Commission.

Sport and Leisure: Funding

Lord Ouseley: To ask Her Majesty's Government how policies and programmes linked to the concept of the Big Society will deliver positive outcomes in situations where a local authority decides to lease the management of all leisure and recreational facilities in order to achieve budgetary reductions and the local community are reluctant to take on the costs and other burdens.

Baroness Hanham: Local authorities that choose to lease or transfer assets to the voluntary or social enterprise sector will want to ensure that such a transfer is financially sustainable over the long term. Handled well, such transfers can generate savings and protect the continued local community use of such facilities.
	Policies such as the community right to buy and the community right to challenge will strengthen the ability of local communities to improve and protect community facilities, including leisure and recreational assets.

Sport: Investment

Lord Ouseley: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether any studies have been conducted about the impact of reduced investment in facilities and infrastructure on participation in general recreational activity and competitive sport at community levels.

Baroness Garden of Frognal: The Department for Culture, Media and Sport is not aware of any such studies.

Tourism: Taxation

Lord Myners: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have been consulted by Cornwall County Council on the introduction of a daily tourist tax in Cornwall.

Baroness Garden of Frognal: The Department for Culture, Media and Sport has not received any representations from Cornwall County Council about the introduction of a daily tourist tax. Taxation is a matter for Her Majesty's Treasury.

Visas

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Browning on 23 June (WA 354), whether the appropriate salary in Appendix A section 75 of the Immigration Rules for Tier 2 (Intra company transfer) employees differs from the tier 2 Guidance with regard to allowances that count towards the appropriate salary; if so, why; and whether under that section (a) accommodation allowances, and (b) travel and subsistence allowances, which are business expenses can be included in the appropriate salary.

Baroness Browning: The policy set out in the Immigration Rules and in tier two guidance is the same. Accommodation allowances relating to the employee's main place of residence in the UK can be included up to the limits set out in the rules and guidance. Allowances to cover business expenses, such as overnight accommodation away from the employees main residence, or travel and subsistence, are categorically excluded.